Episode 80- How to Give Feedback at Work: Sue Anderson on Building an Unshakeable Feedback Culture

Jane Anderson Coach, Trainer, Mediator, Speaker and Author Specialising in Resilience and Empowerment, Sue Anderso

Podcast is also available on the versions below:

Get Notified Of Future Episodes on Apple Podcasts | Spotify


 
Jane Anderson's Show with Sue Anderson

Most managers will tell you they want to give better feedback. Far fewer will tell you they feel confident doing it.

That gap is the starting point for this conversation with Sue Anderson, a coach, trainer, mediator, speaker and author who has spent close to sixteen years helping individuals and teams build resilience and communicate under pressure. Sue is the author of Unshakeable at Work, a book about how to stop taking things personally and start building resilience, and she's spent the past few years researching a very specific workplace problem: how to give feedback at work, particularly performance feedback, in a way that builds trust instead of damaging it.

In this episode, Sue shares the three-part feedback model she uses with clients, the original research behind it, and the practice-building lessons she's learned along the way, including why she nearly didn't charge enough for years of expertise.

This article pulls out the practical, evidence-backed parts of that conversation: what the research says about feedback confidence, the framework for thinking about different types of feedback, and why getting this wrong is more costly than most organisations realise.

Who Is Sue Anderson?

Sue Anderson works as a coach, trainer, mediator, speaker and author specialising in resilience and empowerment. She helps people move from a place of anger and frustration toward strength, control, authority and confidence, and her specialty is helping people build the mental toughness to handle workplace pressure.

Her path into this work wasn't a straight line. She studied psychology at university, then spent around 12 years working in disability within the state government. It was there she was introduced to coaching, specifically a methodology called neurosemantics, which was new to Australia at the time and focuses heavily on beliefs and thinking styles.

That discovery led her to leave secure employment and start her own practice. Her first clients weren't corporate leaders; they were children being bullied at school.

From "Unbullyable" to "Unshakeable": How a School Program Became a Corporate Framework

Sue's first program was called Unbullyable, built from her early work coaching children as young as seven who were experiencing bullying. She was often placed with the most difficult cases, including, in her first school placement, working directly with students engaging in bullying behaviour.

That early, high-pressure training ground shaped the way she works now. As she puts it, coaching challenging teenagers "taught me to be nonjudgmental, to truly listen, to understand what's going on for them."

Parents of the children she coached began asking her to bring the same work into their workplaces. But the name didn't translate. Organisations didn't want to acknowledge they had "a bullying problem," even when the underlying dynamics (difficult people, damaging feedback, high-conflict relationships) were exactly the same.

So Unbullyable became Unshakeable at Work. The model stayed the same; only the framing changed. Instead of one bully, the workplace version acknowledges that people can be affected by five different difficult customers in a day, or by a single piece of feedback that genuinely rattles them.

That reframing opened the door to leadership coaching, team workshops, and eventually, Sue's specialisation in high-conflict teams and workplace bullying dynamics, including groups so fractured that, as she describes it, they "wouldn't even sit in the room with each other."

Underneath almost all of that work, Sue identified one recurring theme: whether or not people feel comfortable communicating with each other. And at the centre of that, specifically, is feedback.

The Three Types of Workplace Feedback (and Why One Terrifies Leaders)

Sue Anderson's model breaks workplace feedback into three distinct types: acknowledgment, evaluation, and guidance, and research suggests most leaders are confident with two of them, but not the third.

Understanding the difference matters because each type carries a different emotional weight, and treating them as interchangeable is often where feedback conversations go wrong.

Acknowledgment Feedback

This is feedback that recognises what someone is doing well. It's typically the easiest type to give and receive: there's little risk of conflict, and it builds goodwill.

Evaluation Feedback

This is feedback that establishes where someone stands. It involves some kind of rating or measure, the kind of feedback that shows up in formal performance reviews.

This is the type Sue's research and client work consistently point to as the hardest for leaders to deliver with confidence. Giving evaluation feedback means stepping into what Sue calls the role of a "qualified assessor," documenting a rating, justifying it face-to-face, and living with the risk that the other person might disagree, escalate to HR, or feel it was unfair.

Guidance Feedback

This is feedback focused on how someone can improve. It's forward-looking rather than a judgment on current standing, which tends to make it feel more constructive and less personally threatening, both to give and to receive.

The problem, according to Sue, is that evaluation feedback is unavoidable in most formal review processes, yet it's the category where leaders feel least equipped.

What Sue Anderson's Original Research Reveals About Feedback Confidence

Sue's insights aren't just anecdotal. She commissioned her own research, run in partnership with her daughter, who was completing a PhD in psychology at the time. Together they built a survey (using Qualtrics) and analysed the results using statistical software, looking specifically at patterns in how confident people feel about giving and receiving feedback.

A few consistent findings emerged:

  • Most people feel they aren't receiving enough feedback.

  • Most people also believe they aren't giving enough feedback.

  • Evaluation feedback is the type people feel least confident delivering, across the groups surveyed.

Sue also looked at differences by age group, by gender, and, notably, given her client base, by geography, comparing people working in rural councils against those in metro councils. This lines up with broader Australian workforce research: the Australian HR Institute's study on performance management practices similarly found that ongoing feedback stood out as one of the few practices HR professionals rated as genuinely effective, even as confidence in formal evaluation processes lagged behind.

One figure Sue shared stood out: she recalled that in one of the age groups surveyed, only around 3% of respondents said they felt confident offering evaluation-style feedback. It's worth noting this figure came from Sue's own in-progress research rather than a published, peer-reviewed study, and she herself wasn't certain which specific age cohort it applied to. Directionally, though, it reflects a consistent pattern across her client conversations: leaders are far more comfortable acknowledging good work or offering development guidance than they are rating someone's performance to their face.

The Feedback Fitness Framework

Out of this research and years of coaching, Sue developed what she now calls the Feedback Fitness Framework, her own intellectual property, built specifically around helping leaders build confidence in the type of feedback they find hardest.

This framework has become central to her work with what she describes as her ideal client: rural and metro local councils, along with state government and other organisations.

Sue is currently writing a follow-up book, tentatively titled Feedback Fitness, extending the ideas from Unshakeable at Work into a more focused resource on this specific skill.

Why Poor Feedback Damages Trust and Costs Organisations

Getting feedback wrong isn't a minor management misstep. It's a direct driver of damaged trust, disengagement, and staff turnover.

According to Sue, when leaders aren't skilled at offering feedback, particularly evaluation feedback, the consequences compound quickly:

  • The relationship becomes damaged.

  • Trust erodes.

  • Conversations become awkward, and communication breaks down.

  • The person receiving poor feedback may disengage, leave the organisation, lodge a formal complaint, or in some cases allege bullying.

Sue describes fielding calls from HR professionals dealing with exactly this kind of fallout, situations where an investigation has already taken place and an organisation is trying to avoid losing a leader entirely. As she puts it, these are "expensive problems": expensive in staff turnover, expensive in formal HR processes, and expensive in the innovation and improvement that never happens because people are too guarded to speak honestly with each other.

This is also where the case for organisation-wide feedback capability becomes clear. It's not just about smoothing over one difficult conversation. It's about building an aspirational capability across a team or organisation, so that feedback becomes a normal, low-risk part of how people work together, not a rare and anxiety-inducing event.

This connects to a broader shift in how Australian workplaces are expected to manage psychological risk. Under the Safe Work Australia model Code of Practice on managing psychosocial hazards, employers have a positive duty to manage factors, including poor workplace relationships and communication breakdowns, that can cause psychological harm. That gives organisations a compliance reason, not just a culture reason, to take feedback capability seriously.

Lessons for Consultants and Coaches Building a Practice

Alongside the feedback research, Sue's conversation offers a candid look at what it takes to grow a coaching or consulting practice, echoing themes covered in Rita Cincotta's conversation on deliberate leadership and building a consulting practice, and lessons that will resonate with anyone building a B2B service business.

Valuing Your Expertise and Pricing

For years, Sue undervalued her own work. She describes discounting herself, thinking of her offer as coming from "just Sue Anderson from Ballarat," partly shaped by early experiences where people questioned whether she was "really" a psychologist.

That shifted once she recognised the depth of what she'd built: nearly sixteen years of experience, a unique set of skills, original research, and, as she puts it, "thousands of hours of confidential conversations" through her coaching work. That recognition gave her the confidence to raise her prices and write proposals that reflected the real value of solving what are often very expensive organisational problems.

Systems That Free Up Creative Capacity

Sue attributes a significant part of her recent growth, close to doubling revenue over two years, to putting proper systems in place. That included bringing on a part-time business manager and a virtual assistant, and moving her workflow into project management tools like Asana.

The effect wasn't just operational. Sue describes how getting tasks out of her head and into a system improved her sleep and, more importantly, freed up mental space for creative and strategic thinking, including noticing feedback-related insights in everyday life and turning them into newsletter content.

Maintaining Long-Term Client Relationships

One of Sue's clearest regrets is not staying in better contact with past clients. She points to parents of children she coached fifteen years earlier, and workshop clients from eight years ago, whose details she no longer has, despite the fact that these relationships likely still hold value.

Her advice for anyone earlier in their practice: keep better records, maintain contact, and treat relationship maintenance as a genuine part of the business, not an afterthought.

Frequently Asked Questions 

What are the three types of feedback in the workplace?

Acknowledgment feedback (recognising what's going well), evaluation feedback (establishing where someone stands, often through a rating), and guidance feedback (advice on how to improve).

Why is evaluation feedback harder to give than other types? 

Evaluation feedback requires the person giving it to act as a "qualified assessor," documenting a rating and justifying it face-to-face, which carries a higher risk of disagreement, conflict, or formal escalation than acknowledgment or guidance feedback.

What is the Feedback Fitness Framework? 

It's a framework developed by Sue Anderson, based on her coaching experience and original research, designed to help leaders build confidence in delivering feedback, particularly the evaluation type they find most difficult.

How does poor feedback affect workplace trust? 

According to Sue Anderson, poorly delivered feedback can damage relationships, erode trust, make communication awkward, and in some cases lead to disengagement, complaints, or staff turnover.

What is the difference between "Unbullyable" and "Unshakeable at Work"? 

Unbullyable was Sue Anderson's original program, developed for coaching children experiencing bullying. Unshakeable at Work applies the same underlying resilience model to adult workplaces, reframed around the reality that people can be affected by difficult colleagues, customers, or feedback, not just a single bully.

Conclusion

Sue Anderson's work is a reminder that feedback isn't a single skill leaders either have or don't. It's three distinct skills, and most people are only missing one of them. Evaluation feedback, in particular, deserves far more deliberate attention than it typically gets, given how directly it connects to trust, retention, and organisational performance.

Her journey from coaching bullied children to building a research-backed corporate framework also shows how a specific, well-defined problem, rather than a broad, generic offering, can become the foundation of a sustainable, high-value practice.

Work With Jane Anderson

Explore more conversations on leadership, culture, and building a resilient practice in my episode with Maureen Kyne on upward bullying in the workplace, or if you're building your own consulting or coaching practice like Sue Anderson, find out how the Women with Influence community supports experts turning deep expertise into a sustainable, well-priced B2B practice.

 

Key Takeaways from Today’s Episode:

 

Full Show Transcript:

 


Most of the guests interviewed are current or alumni members of the Women With Influence community. Click here to find out more

Previous
Previous

Episode 81- Grief Therapist Cait Wotherspoon on Supporting Grief in the Workplace

Next
Next

Episode 79- Facilitator vs Trainer: Jacinta Cubis on Guiding Groups Without Controlling Them